On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Blair Bethwaite <blair.bethwaite@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 4 November 2014 01:50, Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> In the Ceph session at the OpenStack summit someone asked what the CephFS >> survey results looked like. > > Thanks Sage, that was me! > >> Here's the link: >> >> https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-L5JV7WXL/ >> >> In short, people want >> >> fsck >> multimds >> snapshots >> quotas > > TBH I'm a bit surprised by a couple of these and hope maybe you guys > will apply a certain amount of filtering on this... > > fsck and quotas were there for me, but multimds and snapshots are what > I'd consider "icing" features - they're nice to have but not on the > critical path to using cephfs instead of e.g. nfs in a production > setting. I'd have thought stuff like small file performance and > gateway support was much more relevant to uptake and > positive/pain-free UX. Interested to hear others rationale here. For the use case we're looking at cephfs for at $dayjob we really need snapshots. I think anyone building a cheap-and-deep cluster for archival storage would like to be more than one errant rm -rf away from a *very* long weekend. Thanks, -- Patrick Hahn _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |