On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 10:36:07 +1100, Blair Bethwaite <blair.bethwaite@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > TBH I'm a bit surprised by a couple of these and hope maybe you guys > will apply a certain amount of filtering on this... > > fsck and quotas were there for me, but multimds and snapshots are what > I'd consider "icing" features - they're nice to have but not on the > critical path to using cephfs instead of e.g. nfs in a production > setting. I'd have thought stuff like small file performance and > gateway support was much more relevant to uptake and > positive/pain-free UX. Interested to hear others rationale here. > Those are related; if small file performance will be enough for one MDS to handle high load with a lot of small files (typical case of webserver), having multiple acive MDS will be less of a priority; And if someone currently have OSD on bunch of relatively weak nodes, again, having active-active setup with MDS will be more interesting to him than someone that can just buy new fast machine for it. -- Mariusz Gronczewski, Administrator Efigence S. A. ul. Wołoska 9a, 02-583 Warszawa T: [+48] 22 380 13 13 F: [+48] 22 380 13 14 E: mariusz.gronczewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:mariusz.gronczewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
