There are a couple of open tickets about bogus (negative) stats on PGs: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/5884 http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/7737 Cheers, John On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Erik Logtenberg <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > Yesterday I removed two OSD's, to replace them with new disks. Ceph was > not able to completely reach all active+clean state, but some degraded > objects remain. However, the amount of degraded objects is negative > (-82), see below: > > 2014-10-30 13:31:32.862083 mon.0 [INF] pgmap v209175: 768 pgs: 761 > active+clean, 7 active+remapped; 1644 GB data, 2524 GB used, 17210 GB / > 19755 GB avail; 2799 B/s wr, 1 op/s; -82/1439391 objects degraded (-0.006%) > > According to "rados df", the -82 degraded objects are part of the > cephfs-data-cache pool, which is an SSD-backed replicated pool, that > functions as a cache pool for an HDD-backed erasure coded pool for cephfs. > > The cache should be empty, because I isseud "rados > cache-flush-evict-all"-command, and "rados -p cephfs-data-cache ls" > indeed shows zero objects in this pool. > > "rados df" however does show 192 objects for this pool, with just 35KB > used and -82 degraded: > > pool name category KB objects clones > degraded unfound rd rd KB wr wr KB > cephfs-data-cache - 35 192 0 > -82 0 1119 348800 1198371 1703673493 > > Please advice... > > Thanks, > > Erik. > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |