Re: the state of cephfs in giant

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 14 Oct 2014, Amon Ott wrote:
> Am 13.10.2014 20:16, schrieb Sage Weil:
> > We've been doing a lot of work on CephFS over the past few months. This
> > is an update on the current state of things as of Giant.
> ...
> > * Either the kernel client (kernel 3.17 or later) or userspace (ceph-fuse
> >   or libcephfs) clients are in good working order.
> 
> Thanks for all the work and specially for concentrating on CephFS! We
> have been watching and testing for years by now and really hope to
> change our Clusters to CephFS soon.
> 
> For kernel maintenance reasons, we only want to run longterm stable
> kernels. And for performance reasons and because of severe known
> problems we want to avoid Fuse. How good are our chances of a stable
> system with the kernel client in the latest longterm kernel 3.14? Will
> there be further bugfixes or feature backports?

We haven't been backporting CephFS bug fixes to the stable kernels the 
same way we've been doing RBD bugs; it's a bit of a chore.  This can be 
done retroactively but no promises.  Probably 3.14 makes the most sense.  
The RHEL7/CentOS7 kernel is also a likely target.

sage
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux