Thanks John - It did look like it was heading in that direction! I did wonder if a 'fs map' & 'fs unmap' would be useful too; filesystem backups, migrations between clusters & async DR could be facilitated by moving underlying pool objects around between clusters. Dave On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 11:22 AM, John Spray <john.spray at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi David, > > We haven't written any code for the multiple filesystems feature so > far, but the new "fs new"/"fs rm"/"fs ls" management commands were > designed with this in mind -- currently only supporting one > filesystem, but to allow slotting in the multiple filesystems feature > without too much disruption. There is some design work to be done as > well, such as how the system should handle standby MDSs (assigning to > a particular filesystem, floating between filesystems, etc). > > Cheers, > John > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 11:11 AM, David Barker <dave.barker at gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi Cephalopods, > > > > Browsing the list archives, I know this has come up before, but I thought > > I'd check in for an update. > > > > I'm in an environment where it would be useful to run a file system per > > department in a single cluster (or at a pinch enforcing some client / fs > > tree security). Has there been much progress recently? > > > > Many thanks, > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ceph-users mailing list > > ceph-users at lists.ceph.com > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/attachments/20140917/972480aa/attachment.htm>
 |