the current ceph cluster was compiled by hand , and now i disabled scrub and deep-scrub until your new dev version released I hope the new version can help to scrub all data which already error displayed From: Haomai Wang<mailto:haomaiwang@xxxxxxxxx> Date: 2014-09-11 12:00 To: ???<mailto:Derek at f-club.cn> CC: ceph-users<mailto:ceph-users at lists.ceph.com> Subject: Re: Re: Why so much inconsistent error in 0.85? No, you need to wait the next develop release, or you can compile it by hand. On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:35 AM, ??? <Derek at f-club.cn<mailto:Derek at f-club.cn>> wrote: haomai wang, i already use 0.85 which is the latest version of CEPH, is there any new version than 0.85? From: Haomai Wang<mailto:haomaiwang@xxxxxxxxx> Date: 2014-09-11 10:02 To: ???<mailto:Derek at f-club.cn> CC: ceph-users<mailto:ceph-users at lists.ceph.com> Subject: Re: Why so much inconsistent error in 0.85? Please check (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8589). KeyValueStore is a experiment backend. We still make it stable now. You can checkout master branch to fix it. On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 8:35 AM, ??? <Derek at f-club.cn<mailto:Derek at f-club.cn>> wrote: dear, Is this another big bug of CEPH? [cid:_Foxmail.1 at 33a80c28-4cc8-0acf-76c4-3eb8a3b9baa3] _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users at lists.ceph.com<mailto:ceph-users at lists.ceph.com> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com -- Best Regards, Wheat -- Best Regards, Wheat -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/attachments/20140911/f0688394/attachment.htm> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: CatchFC42(09-11-(09-11-13-54-27).jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 89645 bytes Desc: CatchFC42(09-11-(09-11-13-54-27).jpg URL: <http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/attachments/20140911/f0688394/attachment.jpg>
 |