Asked for emperor, got firefly. (You can't take the sky from me?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 20:24:00 -0400 J David wrote:

> While adding some nodes to a ceph emperor cluster using ceph-deploy,
> the new nodes somehow wound up with 0.80.1, which I think is a Firefly
> release.
>
This was asked and solved in the "ceph-deploy with --release (--stable)
for dumpling?" thread earlier this week.

I wouldn't want to run mixed cluster for a prolonged time, so if you don't
want to upgrade to firefly in general, pin it to emperor. 

Christian

> The ceph version on existing nodes:
> 
> $ ceph --version
> ceph version 0.72.2 (a913ded2ff138aefb8cb84d347d72164099cfd60)
> 
> The repository on the new nodes:
> 
> $ cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ceph.list
> deb http://ceph.com/debian-emperor/ trusty main
> 
> The ceph version on new nodes:
> 
> $ ceph --version
> ceph version 0.80.1 (a38fe1169b6d2ac98b427334c12d7cf81f809b74)
> 
> Inspecting the repository on ceph.com, it does look like it contains
> 0.72.2 packages.
> 
> How did we get 0.80.1 instead?  Is this expected behavior?  Will it
> cause problems for us?
> 
> Thanks for any advice!
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users at lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> 


-- 
Christian Balzer        Network/Systems Engineer                
chibi at gol.com   	Global OnLine Japan/Fusion Communications
http://www.gol.com/


[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux