Performance seems quite low on those. I?d really step it up to intel s3700s. Check the performance benchmarks here and compare between them: http://www.anandtech.com/show/8066/crucial-mx100-256gb-512gb-review/3 http://www.anandtech.com/show/6433/intel-ssd-dc-s3700-200gb-review/3 If you?re going to run it in production I?d go with the intel one. Kind Regards, David 1 aug 2014 kl. 10:38 skrev Andrei Mikhailovsky <andrei at arhont.com>: > Hello guys, > > Was wondering if anyone has tried using the Crucial MX100 ssds either for osd journals or cache pool? It seems like a good cost effective alternative to the more expensive drives and read/write performance is very good as well. > > Thanks > > -- > Andrei Mikhailovsky > Director > Arhont Information Security > > Web: http://www.arhont.com > http://www.wi-foo.com > Tel: +44 (0)870 4431337 > Fax: +44 (0)208 429 3111 > PGP: Key ID - 0x2B3438DE > PGP: Server - keyserver.pgp.com > > DISCLAIMER > > The information contained in this email is intended only for the use of the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please immediately advise us by return email at andrei at arhont.com and delete and purge the email and any attachments without making a copy. > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users at lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/attachments/20140801/01306336/attachment.htm>
 |