slow read speeds from kernel rbd (Firefly 0.80.4)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,
don't see an improvement with tcp_window_scaling=0 with my configuration.
More the other way: the iperf-performance are much less:

root at ceph-03:~# iperf -c 172.20.2.14
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to 172.20.2.14, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 96.1 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[  3] local 172.20.2.13 port 50429 connected with 172.20.2.14 port 5001
[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
[  3]  0.0-10.0 sec  2.94 GBytes  2.52 Gbits/sec
root at ceph-03:~# sysctl -w "net.ipv4.tcp_window_scaling=1"
net.ipv4.tcp_window_scaling = 1
root at ceph-03:~# iperf -c 172.20.2.14
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to 172.20.2.14, TCP port 5001
TCP window size:  192 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[  3] local 172.20.2.13 port 50431 connected with 172.20.2.14 port 5001
[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
[  3]  0.0-10.0 sec  11.4 GBytes  9.77 Gbits/sec

My kernels are 3.11, 3.14 and the VM-host has an patched rhel-kernel
2.6.32 - the iperf-behavior is between all kernels the same.

switched back to net.ipv4.tcp_window_scaling=1


Udo

On 24.07.2014 22:15, Jean-Tiare LE BIGOT wrote:
> What is your kernel version ? On kernel >= 3.11 sysctl -w
> "net.ipv4.tcp_window_scaling=0" seems to improve the situation a lot.
> It also helped a lot to mitigate processes going (and sticking) in 'D'
> state.
>
>



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux