RBD layering

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ok thanks :
mon 'allow r' osd 'allow  class-read object_prefix rbd_children, allow rwx pool=kvm1, allow rx  pool=templates'
seems to be enough.

One more question about RBD layering :
I've made a clone (child) in my pool 'kvm' from my protected snapshot in my pool 'template' and after launching my vm, the whole fs is read-only.
Am I wrong thinking the protected snapshot acts like the base image and additional data will be store in the clone ?

>Objet?: Re: [ceph-users] RBD layering

On 07/02/2014 10:08 AM, NEVEU Stephane wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm missing around with "rbd layering" to store some ready-to-use 
>> templates (format 2) in a template pool :
>>
>> /Rbd -p templates ls/
>>
>> /Ubuntu1404/
>>
>> /Centos6/
>>
>> /./
>>
>> //
>>
>> /Rbd snap create templates/Ubuntu1404 at Ubuntu1404-snap-protected/
>>
>> /Rbd snap protect templates/Ubuntu1404 at Ubuntu1404-snap-protected/
>>
>> /Rbd clone templates/Ubuntu1404 at Ubuntu1404-snap-protected
>> kvm1/Ubuntu1404-snap-protected-children/
>>
>> My libvirt key is created with :
>>
>> /Ceph auth get-or-create client.kvm1 mon 'allow r' osd 'allow 
>>class-read object_prefix rbd_children, allow rwx pool=kvm1, allow r  
>>pool=templates'/
>>
>> //
>>
>> But read permission for the pool 'templates' seems to be not enough, 
>> libvirt is complaining "RBD cannot access the rbd disk 
>> kvm1/Ubuntu1404-snap-protected-children" so :
>>
>> /Ceph auth get-or-create client.kvm1 mon 'allow r' osd 'allow 
>> class-read object_prefix rbd_children, allow rwx pool=kvm1, allow
>> *rwx* pool=templates'/
>>

>I think that rx should be enough instead of rwx. Could you try that?

>Wido

Hi Wido, thank you:
I'm trying this :
Ceph auth get-or-create client.kvm1 mon 'allow r' osd 'allow  class-read object_prefix rbd_children, allow rwx pool=kvm1, allow rx  pool=templates'
Error EIVAL: key for client.kvm1 exists but cap osd does not match

Is there another way to directly modify caps ? or do I need to suppress the key and re-create it ?

> //
>
> It's actually working but it's probably a bit too much, because I 
> don't want people to be able to modify the parent template so do I 
> have a better choice ?
>
> Libvirt seems to be happier but this clone is read-only and I want now 
> people to use this OS image as a base file and write differences in a 
> backing file (like with qemu . -b .).
>
> How can I do such a thing ? or maybe I'm doing it in a wrong way. any help ?

Am I clear enough here ?

>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users at lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>


--
Wido den Hollander
42on B.V.
Ceph trainer and consultant

Phone: +31 (0)20 700 9902
Skype: contact42on
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users at lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users at lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com


[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux