Thanks Peng, it works! Wei Cao (Buddy) -----Original Message----- From: xan.peng [mailto:xanpeng@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, May 16, 2014 3:34 PM To: Cao, Buddy Cc: ceph-users at ceph.com Subject: Re: ?ceph pg dump summary ?f json? question Weired. Maybe you can check the source code (src/mon/PGMonitor.cc, around L1434). But, looks like there is another command "ceph pg dump_json {all | summary | sum | pools | ...} which you can try. On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Cao, Buddy <buddy.cao at intel.com> wrote: > In my env, "ceph pg dump all -f json" only returns result below, > > {"version":45685,"stamp":"2014-05-15 > 23:50:27.773608","last_osdmap_epoch":13875,"last_pg_scan":13840,"full_ > ratio":"0.950000","near_full_ratio":"0.850000","pg_stats_sum":{"stat_s > um":{"num_bytes":151487109145,"num_objects":36186,"num_object_clones": > 0,"num_object_copies":72372,"num_objects_missing_on_primary":0,"num_ob > jects_degraded":5716,"num_objects_unfound":0,"num_read":8502912,"num_r > ead_kb":611729970,"num_write":2737247,"num_write_kb":340122861,"num_sc > rub_errors":39,"num_shallow_scrub_errors":39,"num_deep_scrub_errors":0 > ,"num_objects_recovered":267486,"num_bytes_recovered":1120311874505,"n > um_keys_recovered":94},"stat_cat_sum":{},"log_size":952236,"ondisk_log > _size":952236},"osd_stats_sum":{"kb":19626562368,"kb_used":296596996," > kb_avail":19329965372,"hb_in":[],"hb_out":[],"snap_trim_queue_len":0," > num_snap_trimming":0,"op_queue_age_hist":{"histogram":[1,2,0,1,1,2,56, > 5,20,18],"upper_bound":1024},"fs_perf_stat":{"commit_latency_ms":55456 > ,"apply_latency_ms":408}},"pg_stats_delta":{"stat_sum":{"num_bytes":45 > 867008,"num_objects":10,"num_object_clones":0,"num_object_copies":20," > num_objects_missing_on_primary":0,"num_objects_degraded":0,"num_object > s_unfound":0,"num_read":385,"num_read_kb":29360,"num_write":296,"num_w > rite_kb":61320,"num_scrub_errors":0,"num_shallow_scrub_errors":0,"num_ > deep_scrub_errors":0,"num_objects_recovered":0,"num_bytes_recovered":0 > ,"num_keys_recovered":0},"stat_cat_sum":{},"log_size":0,"ondisk_log_si > ze":0}} > > But "ceph pg dump summary" returns much more info than this and even includes a lot pg summaries likes below. Any idea? thanks > 3.3 30 0 0 0 125829120 77 77 active+clean 2014-05-15 23:41:47.950780 13875'77 13875:129 [11,4] [11,4] 0'0 2014-05-15 20:02:58.937561 0'0 2014-05-13 20:02:53.011326 > 4.4 49 0 0 0 205520896 3001 3001 active+clean 2014-05-15 19:52:41.534026 13875'5784 13875:29766 [41,26] [41,26] 13244'5438 2014-05-15 09:47:09.501469 0'0 2014-05-14 09:45:29.872229 > 5.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 active+clean 2014-05-15 19:52:40.344205 0'0 13875:1702 [25,33] [25,33] 0'0 2014-05-15 09:48:33.067498 0'0 2014-05-14 09:47:40.406650 > 6.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 active+clean 2014-05-15 09:49:45.360999 0'0 13875:1678 [24,9] [24,9] 0'0 2014-05-15 09:49:45.360951 0'0 2014-05-14 09:47:42.871263 > 7.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 active+clean 2014-05-15 20:12:03.812881 0'0 13875:58 [33,25] [33,25] 0'0 2014-05-15 20:12:02.859031 0'0 2014-05-15 20:12:02.859031 > pool 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > pool 1 21 0 0 0 9470 21 21 > pool 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > pool 3 13006 0 2032 0 54429261968 39905 39905 > pool 4 22725 0 3616 0 95251489157 909458 909458 > pool 5 3 0 0 0 262 4 4 > pool 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > pool 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > pool 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > sum 35755 0 5648 0 149680760857 949388 949388 > osdstat kbused kbavail kb hb in hb out > 0 79744 486985484 487065228 [1,8,9,16,17,32,33,34,35,36,37,47] [] > 1 80068 486985160 487065228 [0,2,8,9,16,17,32,33,34,35,36,37] [] > 2 9602980 477462248 487065228 [1,3,12,13,18,19,38,39,40,41] [] > 3 18896156 468169072 487065228 [2,4,11,12,13,18,19,20,38,39,40,41] [] > 4 15758800 471306428 487065228 [3,5,12,13,18,19,20,38,39,40,41] [] > 5 13118956 473946272 487065228 [4,6,7,11,12,18,20,38,39,40] [] > 6 83000 486982228 487065228 [5,7,14,15,22,23,42,43,44,45,46,47] [] > > > Wei Cao (Buddy) > > -----Original Message----- > From: xan.peng [mailto:xanpeng at gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, May 16, 2014 2:20 PM > To: Cao, Buddy > Cc: ceph-users at ceph.com > Subject: Re: ?ceph pg dump summary ?f json? question > > Looks like "ceph pg dump all -f json" = "ceph pg dump summary". > > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Cao, Buddy <buddy.cao at intel.com> wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> ?ceph pg dump summary ?f json? does not returns data as much as ?ceph >> pg dump summary?, are there any ways to get the fully Json format >> data for ?ceph pg dump summary?? >> >> >> >> >> >> Wei Cao (Buddy) >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users at lists.ceph.com >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >>
 |