Ceph RDB, VMs, btrfs, COW, OSD journals, f2fs, SSDs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

If I'm storing large VM images on Ceph RDB, and I have OSD journals on SSD, should I _not_ be using a copy on write file system on the OSDs?  I read that large VM images don't play well with COW (e.g. btrfs) [1].  Does Ceph improve this situation? Would btrfs outperform non-cow filesystems in this setting?

Also, I'm considering placing my OSD journals on f2fs-formatted partitions on my Samsung SSDs for hardware resiliency (Samsung created both my SSDs and f2fs) [2].  F2FS uses copy on write [3].  Has anyone ever tried this?  Thoughts?

[1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Btrfs#Copy-On-Write_.28CoW.29
[2] https://www.usenix.org/legacy/event/fast12/tech/full_papers/Min.pdf
[3] http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r27846667-

Thanks,
Joshua
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux