On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:29 AM, Alex Pearson <alex@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi All, > I've been looking, but haven't been able to find any detailed documentation about the journal usage on OSDs. Does anyone have any detailed docs they could share? My initial questions are: Hmm, I'm not sure if we have any serious laymen's stuff. Did you run a search through the docs at ceph.com/docs? > > Is the journal always write-only? (except under recovery) Yes. > I'm using BTRFS, in the default layout, which I'm thinking is very inefficient as it basically forces the discs to seek all the time. (journal partition at start of disc) > Is there a documented process to relocate the journal, without re-creating the OSD? I believe that's in the docs. In short: flush the journal with the OSD cli flag, change the journal location in the config, create the journal with the OSD cli flag, turn on the OSD. > What have other people done to optimize the journal without purchasing SSD's? I'll let people who have done this talk about it in detail, but I think it tends to involve placing the journal on a partition at the outside edge of the disk and possibly giving the volume different properties in the RAID controller if you're using one. -Greg Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com > > > On another point, I'm running on HP Microservers (slow CPU - two cores) with 5 discs - 1x OS, 4x OSD... I've currently got separate OSDs, however have high load due to having more OSD's than cores in the box. I'm thinking of JBOD'ing the OSD discs into pairs using LVM (different sized disks) so I have only two OSD's, does anyone have any opinions on the merits of this? > > Also has anyone seen any CPU usage comparisons of XFS vs EXT4 vs BTRFS? > > Obviously I know I'm running an enterprise system on a shoe string, however I'm keen to use this as a test bed to get comfortable with ceph before recommending it in a real production environment, and I think optimizing and understanding it here could have great benefits when I scale out. > > Lots of questsions, and as ever any insight would be appreciated on any of the points! > > Regards > > Alex > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |