Hi, > Did you bump pgp_num as well? Yes. See: http://dysk.onet.pl/link/BZ968 > 25% pools is two times smaller from other. This is changing after scrubbing. -- Regards Dominik 2014-02-01 Kyle Bader <kyle.bader@xxxxxxxxx>: > >> Change pg_num for .rgw.buckets to power of 2, an 'crush tunables >> optimal' didn't help :( > > Did you bump pgp_num as well? The split pgs will stay in place until pgp_num > is bumped as well, if you do this be prepared for (potentially lots) of data > movement. -- Pozdrawiam Dominik _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |