Hello, On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 09:53:58 +0100 Wolfgang Hennerbichler wrote: > Hello, > > although I don't know much about this topic, I believe that ceph erasure > encoding will probably solve a lot of these issues with some speed > tradeoff. With erasure encoding the replicated data eats way less disk > capacity, so you could use a higher replication factor with a lower disk > usage tradeoff. > Yeah, I saw erasure encoding mentioned a little while ago, but that's likely not to be around by the time I'm going to deploy things. Nevermind that super bleeding edge isn't my style when it comes to production systems. ^o^ And at something like 600 disks, that would still have to be a mighty high level of replication to combat failure statistics... > Wolfgang > > On 12/19/2013 09:39 AM, Christian Balzer wrote: > > [snip] Christian -- Christian Balzer Network/Systems Engineer chibi@xxxxxxx Global OnLine Japan/Fusion Communications http://www.gol.com/ _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |