Re: alternative approaches to CEPH-FS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I've been using CephFS for a meager 40TB store of video clips for editing, from Dumpling to Emperor, and (fingers crossed) so far I haven't had any problems. The only disruption I've seen is that the metadata server will crash every couple of days, and one of the standby MDS will pick up. The replay process seems to take about 30 minutes, so I have to take a break and get coffee, but not the end of the world. I've actually been quite happy with the performance. I have a few workstations accessing the filesystem and each can saturate their individual gigabit connections simultaneously quite easily.

Maybe not the "enterprise" sector use case, but it's getting there :)

-Aaron


On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 12:11 PM, James Pearce <james@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2013-11-14 19:59, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
Cehpfs is in fact one of ceph's big selling points,

IMO the issue is more that since it's not supported, the Enterprise sector won't touch it.

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux