Re: Running on disks that lose their head

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> Putting my sysadmin hat on:
> 
> Once I know a drive has had a head failure, do I trust that the rest of the drive isn't going to go at an inconvenient moment vs just fixing it right now when it's not 3AM on Christmas morning? (true story)  As good as Ceph is, do I trust that Ceph is smart enough to prevent spreading corrupt data all over the cluster if I leave bad disks in place and they start doing terrible things to the data?

I'm confident it won't spread corrupt data :-) I would be more worried about propagation of bit error from non ECC memory than an object being corrupted.

Am I over optimistic ?

> 
> Mark
>-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux