If there’s an underperforming disk, why on earth would
more data be put on it? You’d think it would be less…. I would think an
overperforming disk should (desirably) cause that case,right? From: ceph-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ceph-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Greg Chavez Kevin, in my experience that usually indicates a bad or underperforming disk, or a too-high priority. Try running "ceph osd crush reweight osd.<##> 1.0. If that doesn't do the trick, you may want to just out that guy. I don't think the crush algorithm guarantees balancing things out in the way you're expecting.
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Kevin Weiler <Kevin.Weiler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Hi guys, I have an OSD in my cluster that is near full at 90%, but we're using a little less than half the available storage in the cluster. Shouldn't this be balanced out? -- Kevin Weiler IT IMC Financial Markets | 233 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 4300 | Chicago, IL 60606 | http://imc-chicago.com/ Phone:
+1 312-204-7439 | Fax:
+1 312-244-3301 | E-Mail: kevin.weiler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com