G'day Mark, I stumbled across an older thread it looks like you were involved with the centos and poor seq write performance on the R515's. Were you using centos or Ubuntu on your server at the time? (I'm wondering if this could be related to Ubuntu) http://marc.info/?t=134819117000002&r=1&w=2 Also I tried as you suggested to put the raid controller into JBOD mode but no joy. I also tried cross flashing the card as its apparently a 9260 but we don't have any spare slots outside of the storage slot of which the raid controller cables can reach so that was a non-event :( If you want to give it a try, if you have access to longer cables and or other servers you can put the perc h700 into. I downloaded this flashing kit from here, (has all of the tools) grabbed a freedos usb and copied it all onto that. http://forums.laptopvideo2go.com/topic/29166-sas2108-lsi-9260-based-firmware-files/ Then grabbed the latest 9260 firmware from, http://www.lsi.com/downloads/Public/MegaRAID%20Common%20Files/12.13.0-0154_SAS_2108_Fw_Image_APP2.130.383-2315.zip *** Steps to Cross Flash *** **** Disclaimer you do this at your own risk, I take no responsibility if you brick your card, Warranty, etc **** In a Dell R515 If you write the SBR of a LSI card i.e. the 9260 and reboot the system, The system will be halted as it's now a non-dell card in the storage slot. However if you attempt to flash the LSI firmware onto the perch700 without the correct SBR it won't flash correctly it seems. So if you have longer cables and or another server to try the h700 in that's not a dell. You can try and cross flash the card. (FYI if you're trying to do this in a dell and you fudge up you can recover your system/raid card by plugging it into another pci-e slot and reapplying the Dell H700 SBR/Firmware) Now I'll assume you have one raid controller in your system so you only have adapter 0 1) Backup your SBR in case you need to restore it ie: Megarec -readsbr 0 prch700.sbr 2) Write the SBR of the card you want to flash ie: megarec -writesbr 0 sbr9260.bin 3) Erase the raid controller bios/firmware Megarec -cleanflash 0 4) Reboot 5) flash new firmware Megarec -m0flash 0 mr2108fw.rom 6) Reboot & Done. Also if your command errors out half way through flashing/erasing run it again. Regards, Quenten Grasso -----Original Message----- From: ceph-devel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ceph-devel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mark Nelson Sent: Sunday, 22 September 2013 10:40 PM Cc: ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Ceph write performance and my Dell R515's On 09/22/2013 03:12 AM, Quenten Grasso wrote: > > Hi All, > > I'm finding my write performance is less than I would have expected. > After spending some considerable amount of time testing several > different configurations I can never seems to break over ~360mb/s > write even when using tmpfs for journaling. > > So I've purchased 3x Dell R515's with 1 x AMD 6C CPU with 12 x 3TB SAS > & 2 x 100GB Intel DC S3700 SSD's & 32GB Ram with the Perc H710p Raid > controller and Dual Port 10GBE Network Cards. > > So first up I realise the SSD's were a mistake, I should have bought > the 200GB Ones as they have considerably better write though put of > ~375 Mb/s vs 200 Mb/s > > So to our Nodes Configuration, > > 2 x 3TB disks in Raid1 for OS/MON & 1 partition for OSD, 12 Disks in a > Single each in a Raid0 (like a JBOD Fashion) with a 1MB Stripe size, > > (Stripe size this part was particularly important because I found the > stripe size matters considerably even on a single disk raid0. contrary > to what you might read on the internet) > > Also each disk is configured with (write back cache) is enabled and > (read head) disabled. > > For Networking, All nodes are connected via LACP bond with L3 hashing > and using iperf I can get up to 16gbit/s tx and rx between the nodes. > > OS: Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS w/ Kernel 3.10.12-031012-generic (had to > upgrade kernel due to 10Gbit Intel NIC's driver issues) > > So this gives me 11 OSD's & 2 SSD's Per Node. > I'm a bit leery about that 1 OSD on the RAID1. It may be fine, but you definitely will want to do some investigation to make sure that OSD isn't holding the other ones back. iostat or collectl might be useful, along with the ceph osd admin socket and the dump_ops_in_flight and dump_historic_ops commands. > Next I've tried several different configurations which I'll briefly > describe 2 of which below, > > 1)Cluster Configuration 1, > > 33 OSD's with 6x SSD's as Journals, w/ 15GB Journals on SSD. > > # ceph osd pool create benchmark1 1800 1800 > > # rados bench -p benchmark1 180 write --no-cleanup > > -------------------------------------------------- > > Maintaining 16 concurrent writes of 4194304 bytes for up to 180 > seconds or 0 objects > > Total time run: 180.250417 > > Total writes made: 10152 > > Write size: 4194304 > > Bandwidth (MB/sec): 225.287 > > Stddev Bandwidth: 35.0897 > > Max bandwidth (MB/sec): 312 > > Min bandwidth (MB/sec): 0 > > Average Latency: 0.284054 > > Stddev Latency: 0.199075 > > Max latency: 1.46791 > > Min latency: 0.038512 > > -------------------------------------------------- > What was your pool replication set to? > # rados bench -p benchmark1 180 seq > > ------------------------------------------------- > > Total time run: 43.782554 > > Total reads made: 10120 > > Read size: 4194304 > > Bandwidth (MB/sec): 924.569 > > Average Latency: 0.0691903 > > Max latency: 0.262542 > > Min latency: 0.015756 > > ------------------------------------------------- > > In this configuration I found my write performance suffers a lot to > the SSD's seem to be a bottleneck and my write performance using rados > bench was around 224-230mb/s > > 2)Cluster Configuration 2, > > 33 OSD's with 1Gbyte Journals on tmpfs. > > # ceph osd pool create benchmark1 1800 1800 > > # rados bench -p benchmark1 180 write --no-cleanup > > -------------------------------------------------- > > Maintaining 16 concurrent writes of 4194304 bytes for up to 180 > seconds or 0 objects > > Total time run: 180.044669 > > Total writes made: 15328 > > Write size: 4194304 > > Bandwidth (MB/sec): 340.538 > > Stddev Bandwidth: 26.6096 > > Max bandwidth (MB/sec): 380 > > Min bandwidth (MB/sec): 0 > > Average Latency: 0.187916 > > Stddev Latency: 0.0102989 > > Max latency: 0.336581 > > Min latency: 0.034475 > > -------------------------------------------------- > Definitely low, especially with journals on tmpfs. :( How are the CPUs doing at this point? We have some R515s in our lab, and they definitely are slow too. Ours have 7 OSD disks and 1 Dell branded SSD (usually unused) each and can do about ~150MB/s writes per system. It's actually a puzzle we've been trying to solve for quite some time. Some thoughts: Could the expander backplane be having issues due to having to tunnel STP for the SATA SSDs (or potentially be causing expander wide resets)? Could the H700 (and apparently H710) be doing something unusual that the stock LSI firmware handles better? We replaced the H700 with an Areca 1880 and definitely saw changes in performance (better large IO throughput and worse IOPS), but the performance was still much lower than in a supermicro node with no expanders in the backplane using either an LSI 2208 or Areca 1880. Things you might want to try: - single node tests, and if you have an alternate controller you can try, seeing if that works better. - removing the S3700s from the chassis entirely and retry the tmpfs journal tests. - Since the H710 is SAS2208 based, you may be able to use megacli to set it into JBOD mode and see if that works any better (it may if you are using SSD or tmpfs backed journals). MegaCli -AdpSetProp -EnableJBOD -val -aN|-a0,1,2|-aALL MegaCli -PDMakeJBOD -PhysDrv[E0:S0,E1:S1,...] -aN|-a0,1,2|-aALL > # rados bench -p benchmark1 180 seq > > ------------------------------------------------- > > Total time run: 76.481303 > > Total reads made: 15328 > > Read size: 4194304 > > Bandwidth (MB/sec): 801.660 > > Average Latency: 0.079814 > > Max latency: 0.317827 > > Min latency: 0.016857 > > ------------------------------------------------- > > Now it seems there is no bottleneck for journaling as we are using > tmpfs, however still less then what I would expect write speed the sas > disks are barely busy via iostat.. > > So I thought it might be a disk bus throughput issue. > > Next I completed some dd tests... > > This below is in a script dd-x.sh which executes the 11 readers or > writers at once. > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/srv/ceph/osd.0/ddfile bs=32k count=100k > oflag=direct & > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/srv/ceph/osd.1/ddfile bs=32k count=100k > oflag=direct & > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/srv/ceph/osd.2/ddfile bs=32k count=100k > oflag=direct & > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/srv/ceph/osd.3/ddfile bs=32k count=100k > oflag=direct & > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/srv/ceph/osd.4/ddfile bs=32k count=100k > oflag=direct & > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/srv/ceph/osd.5/ddfile bs=32k count=100k > oflag=direct & > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/srv/ceph/osd.6/ddfile bs=32k count=100k > oflag=direct & > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/srv/ceph/osd.7/ddfile bs=32k count=100k > oflag=direct & > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/srv/ceph/osd.8/ddfile bs=32k count=100k > oflag=direct & > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/srv/ceph/osd.9/ddfile bs=32k count=100k > oflag=direct & > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/srv/ceph/osd.10/ddfile bs=32k count=100k > oflag=direct & > > this gives me aggregated write throughput of around 1,135 MB/s Write. > > Simular script now to test reads, > > dd if=/srv/ceph/osd.0/ddfile of=/dev/null bs=32k count=100k > iflag=direct & > > dd if=/srv/ceph/osd.1/ddfile of=/dev/null bs=32k count=100k > iflag=direct & > > dd if=/srv/ceph/osd.2/ddfile of=/dev/null bs=32k count=100k > iflag=direct & > > dd if=/srv/ceph/osd.3/ddfile of=/dev/null bs=32k count=100k > iflag=direct & > > dd if=/srv/ceph/osd.4/ddfile of=/dev/null bs=32k count=100k > iflag=direct & > > dd if=/srv/ceph/osd.5/ddfile of=/dev/null bs=32k count=100k > iflag=direct & > > dd if=/srv/ceph/osd.6/ddfile of=/dev/null bs=32k count=100k > iflag=direct & > > dd if=/srv/ceph/osd.7/ddfile of=/dev/null bs=32k count=100k > iflag=direct & > > dd if=/srv/ceph/osd.8/ddfile of=/dev/null bs=32k count=100k > iflag=direct & > > dd if=/srv/ceph/osd.9/ddfile of=/dev/null bs=32k count=100k > iflag=direct & > > dd if=/srv/ceph/osd.10/ddfile of=/dev/null bs=32k count=100k > iflag=direct & > > this gives me aggregated read throughput of around 1,382 MB/s Read. > > Next I'll lower the block size to show the results, > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/srv/ceph/osd.0/ddfile bs=4k count=100k > oflag=direct & > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/srv/ceph/osd.1/ddfile bs=4k count=100k > oflag=direct & > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/srv/ceph/osd.2/ddfile bs=4k count=100k > oflag=direct & > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/srv/ceph/osd.3/ddfile bs=4k count=100k > oflag=direct & > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/srv/ceph/osd.4/ddfile bs=4k count=100k > oflag=direct & > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/srv/ceph/osd.5/ddfile bs=4k count=100k > oflag=direct & > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/srv/ceph/osd.6/ddfile bs=4k count=100k > oflag=direct & > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/srv/ceph/osd.7/ddfile bs=4k count=100k > oflag=direct & > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/srv/ceph/osd.8/ddfile bs=4k count=100k > oflag=direct & > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/srv/ceph/osd.9/ddfile bs=4k count=100k > oflag=direct & > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/srv/ceph/osd.10/ddfile bs=4k count=100k > oflag=direct & > > this gives me aggregated write throughput of around 300 MB/s Write. > > dd if=/srv/ceph/osd.0/ddfile of=/dev/null bs=4k count=100k > iflag=direct & > > dd if=/srv/ceph/osd.1/ddfile of=/dev/null bs=4k count=100k > iflag=direct & > > dd if=/srv/ceph/osd.2/ddfile of=/dev/null bs=4k count=100k > iflag=direct & > > dd if=/srv/ceph/osd.3/ddfile of=/dev/null bs=4k count=100k > iflag=direct & > > dd if=/srv/ceph/osd.4/ddfile of=/dev/null bs=4k count=100k > iflag=direct & > > dd if=/srv/ceph/osd.5/ddfile of=/dev/null bs=4k count=100k > iflag=direct & > > dd if=/srv/ceph/osd.6/ddfile of=/dev/null bs=4k count=100k > iflag=direct & > > dd if=/srv/ceph/osd.7/ddfile of=/dev/null bs=4k count=100k > iflag=direct & > > dd if=/srv/ceph/osd.8/ddfile of=/dev/null bs=4k count=100k > iflag=direct & > > dd if=/srv/ceph/osd.9/ddfile of=/dev/null bs=4k count=100k > iflag=direct & > > dd if=/srv/ceph/osd.10/ddfile of=/dev/null bs=4k count=100k > iflag=direct & > > this gives me aggregated read throughput of around 430 MB/s Read, > > This is my ceph.conf, only difference between the configs is the > journal dio = false > > ---------------- > > [global] > > auth cluster required = cephx > > auth service required = cephx > > auth client required = cephx > > public network = 10.100.96.0/24 > > cluster network = 10.100.128.0/24 > > journal dio = false > > [mon] > > mon data = /var/ceph/mon.$id > > [mon.a] > > host = rbd01 > > mon addr = 10.100.96.10:6789 > > [mon.b] > > host = rbd02 > > mon addr = 10.100.96.11:6789 > > [mon.c] > > host = rbd03 > > mon addr = 10.100.96.12:6789 > > [osd] > > osd data = /srv/ceph/osd.$id > > osd journal size = 1000 > > osd mkfs type = xfs > > osd mkfs options xfs = "-f" > > osd mount options xfs = > "rw,noexec,nodev,noatime,nodiratime,barrier=0,inode64,logbufs=8,logbsize=256k" > > [osd.0] > > host = rbd01 > > osd journal = /tmp/tmpfs/osd.$id > > devs = /dev/sda5 > > [osd.1] > > host = rbd01 > > osd journal = /tmp/tmpfs/osd.$id > > devs = /dev/sdb2 > > [osd.2] > > host = rbd01 > > osd journal = /tmp/tmpfs/osd.$id > > devs = /dev/sdc2 > > [osd.3] > > host = rbd01 > > osd journal = /tmp/tmpfs/osd.$id > > devs = /dev/sdd2 > > [osd.4] > > host = rbd01 > > osd journal = /tmp/tmpfs/osd.$id > > devs = /dev/sde2 > > [osd.5] > > host = rbd01 > > osd journal = /tmp/tmpfs/osd.$id > > devs = /dev/sdf2 > > [osd.6] > > host = rbd01 > > osd journal = /tmp/tmpfs/osd.$id > > devs = /dev/sdg2 > > [osd.7] > > host = rbd01 > > osd journal = /tmp/tmpfs/osd.$id > > devs = /dev/sdh2 > > [osd.8] > > host = rbd01 > > osd journal = /tmp/tmpfs/osd.$id > > devs = /dev/sdi2 > > [osd.9] > > host = rbd01 > > osd journal = /tmp/tmpfs/osd.$id > > devs = /dev/sdj2 > > [osd.10] > > host = rbd01 > > osd journal = /tmp/tmpfs/osd.$id > > devs = /dev/sdk2 > > [osd.11] > > host = rbd02 > > osd journal = /tmp/tmpfs/osd.$id > > devs = /dev/sda5 > > [osd.12] > > host = rbd02 > > osd journal = /tmp/tmpfs/osd.$id > > devs = /dev/sdb2 > > [osd.13] > > host = rbd02 > > osd journal = /tmp/tmpfs/osd.$id > > devs = /dev/sdc2 > > [osd.14] > > host = rbd02 > > osd journal = /tmp/tmpfs/osd.$id > > devs = /dev/sdd2 > > [osd.15] > > host = rbd02 > > osd journal = /tmp/tmpfs/osd.$id > > devs = /dev/sde2 > > [osd.16] > > host = rbd02 > > osd journal = /tmp/tmpfs/osd.$id > > devs = /dev/sdf2 > > [osd.17] > > host = rbd02 > > osd journal = /tmp/tmpfs/osd.$id > > devs = /dev/sdg2 > > [osd.18] > > host = rbd02 > > osd journal = /tmp/tmpfs/osd.$id > > devs = /dev/sdh2 > > [osd.19] > > host = rbd02 > > osd journal = /tmp/tmpfs/osd.$id > > devs = /dev/sdi2 > > [osd.20] > > host = rbd02 > > osd journal = /tmp/tmpfs/osd.$id > > devs = /dev/sdj2 > > [osd.21] > > host = rbd02 > > osd journal = /tmp/tmpfs/osd.$id > > devs = /dev/sdk2 > > [osd.22] > > host = rbd03 > > osd journal = /tmp/tmpfs/osd.$id > > devs = /dev/sda5 > > [osd.23] > > host = rbd03 > > osd journal = /tmp/tmpfs/osd.$id > > devs = /dev/sdb2 > > [osd.24] > > host = rbd03 > > osd journal = /tmp/tmpfs/osd.$id > > devs = /dev/sdc2 > > [osd.25] > > host = rbd03 > > osd journal = /tmp/tmpfs/osd.$id > > devs = /dev/sdd2 > > [osd.26] > > host = rbd03 > > osd journal = /tmp/tmpfs/osd.$id > > devs = /dev/sde2 > > [osd.27] > > host = rbd03 > > osd journal = /tmp/tmpfs/osd.$id > > devs = /dev/sdf2 > > [osd.28] > > host = rbd03 > > osd journal = /tmp/tmpfs/osd.$id > > devs = /dev/sdg2 > > [osd.29] > > host = rbd03 > > osd journal = /tmp/tmpfs/osd.$id > > devs = /dev/sdh2 > > [osd.30] > > host = rbd03 > > osd journal = /tmp/tmpfs/osd.$id > > devs = /dev/sdi2 > > [osd.31] > > host = rbd03 > > osd journal = /tmp/tmpfs/osd.$id > > devs = /dev/sdj2 > > [osd.32] > > host = rbd03 > > osd journal = /tmp/tmpfs/osd.$id > > devs = /dev/sdk2 > > --------------------- > > Any Ideas? > > Cheers, > > Quenten > > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |