Previous experience with OCFS2 was that its actual performance was pretty lackluster/awful. The bits Oracle threw on top of (I think) ext3 to make it work as a multi-writer filesystem with all of the signalling that implies brought the overall performance down.
Jeff
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Ugis <ugis22@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
I wonder is ocfs2 suitable for hosting OSD data?
In ceph documentation only XFS, ext4 and btrfs are discussed, but
looking at ocfs2 feature list it theoretically also could host OSDs:
Some of the notable features of the file system are:
Optimized Allocations (extents, reservations, sparse, unwritten
extents, punch holes)
REFLINKs (inode-based writeable snapshots)
Indexed Directories
Metadata Checksums
Extended Attributes (unlimited number of attributes per inode)
Advanced Security (POSIX ACLs and SELinux)
User and Group Quotas
Variable Block and Cluster sizes
Journaling (Ordered and Writeback data journaling modes)
Endian and Architecture Neutral (x86, x86_64, ia64 and ppc64)
Buffered, Direct, Asynchronous, Splice and Memory Mapped I/Os
In-built Clusterstack with a Distributed Lock Manager
Cluster-aware Tools (mkfs, fsck, tunefs, etc.)
ocfs2 can work in cluster mode but it can also work for single node.
Just wondering would OSD work on ocfs2 and what would performance
characteristics be.
Any thoughts/experience?
BR,
Ugis Racko
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
