Assuming the networks can intercommunicate, yes. -Greg Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Geraint Jones <geraint@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > One Other thing > > If I set cluster_network on node0 and restart it, then do the same on > node1 will I be able to maintain availability while I roll the change out ? > > On 30/08/13 11:47 AM, "Dimitri Maziuk" <dmaziuk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>On 08/30/2013 01:38 PM, Geraint Jones wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 30/08/13 11:33 AM, "Wido den Hollander" <wido@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> On 08/30/2013 08:19 PM, Geraint Jones wrote: >>>>> Hi Guys >>>>> >>>>> We are using Ceph in production backing an LXC cluster. The setup is >>>>>: 2 >>>>> x Servers, 24 x 3TB Disks each in groups of 3 as RAID0. SSD for >>>>> journals. Bonded 1gbit ethernet (2gbit total). >>>>> >>>> >>>> I think you sized your machines too big. I'd say go for 6 machines with >>>> 8 disks each without RAID-0. Let Ceph do it's job and avoid RAID. >>> >>> Typical traffic is fine - its just been an issue tonight :) >> >>If you hosed and have to recover an 9TB filesystem, you'll have problems >>no matter what, ceph or no ceph. You *will* have a disk failure every >>once in a while, and there's no "r" in raid-0, so don't think what >>happened is not typical. >> >>(There's nothing wrong with raid as long it's >0.) >>-- >>Dimitri Maziuk >>Programmer/sysadmin >>BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu >> >>_______________________________________________ >>ceph-users mailing list >>ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |