I should have also said that we experienced similar performance on Cuttlefish. I have run identical benchmarks on both.
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Oliver Daudey <oliver@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hey Greg,
I encountered a similar problem and we're just in the process of
tracking it down here on the list. Try downgrading your OSD-binaries to
0.61.8 Cuttlefish and re-test. If it's significantly faster on RBD,
you're probably experiencing the same problem I have with Dumpling.
PS: Only downgrade your OSDs. Cuttlefish-monitors don't seem to want to
start with a database that has been touched by a Dumpling-monitor and
don't talk to them, either.
PPS: I've also had OSDs no longer start with an assert while processing
the journal during these upgrade/downgrade-tests, mostly when coming
down from Dumpling to Cuttlefish. If you encounter those, delete your
journal and re-create with `ceph-osd -i <OSD-ID> --mkjournal'. Your
data-store will be OK, as far as I can tell.
Regards,
Oliver
> _______________________________________________
On do, 2013-08-22 at 10:55 -0700, Greg Poirier wrote:
> I have been benchmarking our Ceph installation for the last week or
> so, and I've come across an issue that I'm having some difficulty
> with.
>
>
> Ceph bench reports reasonable write throughput at the OSD level:
>
>
> ceph tell osd.0 bench
> { "bytes_written": 1073741824,
> "blocksize": 4194304,
> "bytes_per_sec": "47288267.000000"}
>
>
> Running this across all OSDs produces on average 50-55 MB/s, which is
> fine with us. We were expecting around 100 MB/s / 2 (journal and OSD
> on same disk, separate partitions).
>
>
> What I wasn't expecting was the following:
>
>
> I tested 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, and 32 VMSs simultaneously writing
> against 33 OSDs. Aggregate write throughput peaked under 400 MB/s:
>
>
> 1 196.013671875
> 2 285.8759765625
> 4 351.9169921875
> 8 386.455078125
> 16 363.8583984375
> 24 353.6298828125
> 32 348.9697265625
>
>
>
> I was hoping to see something closer to # OSDs * Average value for
> ceph bench (approximately 1.2 GB/s peak aggregate write throughput).
>
>
> We're seeing excellent read, randread performance, but writes are a
> bit of a bother.
>
>
> Does anyone have any suggestions?
>
>
> We have 20 Gb/s network
> I used Fio w/ 16 thread concurrency
> We're running Scientific Linux 6.4
> 2.6.32 kernel
> Ceph Dumpling 0.67.1-0.el6
> OpenStack Grizzly
> Libvirt 0.10.2
> qemu-kvm 0.12.1.2-2.355.el6.2.cuttlefish
>
> (I'm using qemu-kvm from the ceph-extras repository, which doesn't
> appear to have a -.dumpling version yet).
>
>
> Thanks very much for any assistance.
>
>
> Greg
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
