On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 04:24:55PM -0700, Josh Durgin wrote:
> On 08/14/2013 02:22 PM, Michael Morgan wrote:
> >Hello Everyone,
> >
> > I have a Ceph test cluster doing storage for an OpenStack Grizzly
> > platform
> >(also testing). Upgrading to 0.67 went fine on the Ceph side with the
> >cluster
> >showing healthy but suddenly I can't upload images into Glance anymore. The
> >upload fails and glance-api throws an error:
> >
> >2013-08-14 15:19:55.898 ERROR glance.api.v1.images
> >[4dcd9de0-af65-4902-a36d-afc5497605e7 3867c65db6cc48398a0f57ce53144e69
> >5dbca756421c4a3eb0a1cc2f1ee3c67c] Failed to upload image
> >2013-08-14 15:19:55.898 24740 TRACE glance.api.v1.images Traceback (most
> >recent call last):
> >2013-08-14 15:19:55.898 24740 TRACE glance.api.v1.images File
> >"/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/glance/api/v1/images.py", line 444, in
> >_upload
> >2013-08-14 15:19:55.898 24740 TRACE glance.api.v1.images
> >image_meta['size'])
> >2013-08-14 15:19:55.898 24740 TRACE glance.api.v1.images File
> >"/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/glance/store/rbd.py", line 241, in add
> >2013-08-14 15:19:55.898 24740 TRACE glance.api.v1.images with
> >rados.Rados(conffile=self.conf_file, rados_id=self.user) as conn:
> >2013-08-14 15:19:55.898 24740 TRACE glance.api.v1.images File
> >"/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/rados.py", line 195, in __init__
> >2013-08-14 15:19:55.898 24740 TRACE glance.api.v1.images raise
> >Error("Rados(): can't supply both rados_id and name")
> >2013-08-14 15:19:55.898 24740 TRACE glance.api.v1.images Error: Rados():
> >can't supply both rados_id and name
> >2013-08-14 15:19:55.898 24740 TRACE glance.api.v1.images
>
> This would be a backwards-compatibility regression in the librados
> python bindings - a fix is in the dumpling branch, and a point
> release is in the works. You could add name=None to that rados.Rados()
> call in glance to work around it in the meantime.
>
> Josh
>
> > I'm not sure if there's a patch I need to track down for Glance or if I
> > missed
> >a change in the necessary Glance/Ceph setup. Is anyone else seeing this
> >behavior? Thanks!
> >
> >-Mike
That's what I ended up doing and it's working fine now. Thanks for the
confirmation and all the hard work on OpenStack integration. I look forward to
the point release.
-Mike
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
