Re: Issues going from 1 to 3 mons

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Any updates on this? My production cluster has been running on one monitor for a while and I’m a little nervous.
 
Can I expect a fix in 0.61.5? Thank you.
 
 
> (Re-adding the list for future reference)
> 
> Wolfgang, from your log file:
> 
> 2013-06-25 14:58:39.739392 7fa329698780 -1 common/config.cc: In
> function 'void md_config_t::set_val_or_die(const char*, const
> char*)' thread 7fa329698780 time 2013-06-25 14:58:39.738501
> common/config.cc: 621: FAILED assert(ret == 0)
> 
>  ceph version 0.61.4 (1669132fcfc27d0c0b5e5bb93ade59d147e23404)
>  1: /usr/bin/ceph-mon() [0x660736]
>  2: /usr/bin/ceph-mon() [0x699d66]
>  3: (pick_addresses(CephContext*)+0x93) [0x69a1a3]
>  4: (main()+0x1e3f) [0x48256f]
>  5: (__libc_start_main()+0xed) [0x7fa3278f576d]
>  6: /usr/bin/ceph-mon() [0x4848bd]
>  NOTE: a copy of the executable, or `objdump -rdS <executable>` is
> needed to interpret this.
> 
> This was initially reported on ticket #5205.  Sage fixed it last
> night, for ticket #5195.  Gary reports it fixed using Sage's patch,
> and said fix was backported to the cuttlefish branch.
> 
> It's worth to mention that the cuttlefish branch also contains a
> couple of commits that should boost monitor performance and avoid
> leveldb hangups.
> 
> Looking into #5195 (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/5195) for more
> info is advised.  Let us know if you decide to try the cuttlefish
> branch (on the monitors) and whether it fixes the issue for you.
> Thanks!
> 
>   -Joao

 

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux