I think object storage (using the Swift-compatible Ceph Object Gateway) is the preferred mechanism for a Glance backend. Neil On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Patrick McGarry <patrick@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Any reason you have chosen to use CephFS here instead of RBD for > direct integration with Glance? > > http://ceph.com/docs/master/rbd/rbd-openstack/ > > > Best Regards, > > > Patrick McGarry > Director, Community || Inktank > > http://ceph.com || http://inktank.com > @scuttlemonkey || @ceph || @inktank > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:12 AM, Li, Chen <chen.li@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I’m trying to use Ceph FS as glance's backend. >> >> I have mount Ceph FS at glance machine. And edit /etc/glance/glance-api.conf >> to use the mounted directory. >> >> But when I upload the image as I used to, I met the error: >> >> >> >> Request returned failure status. >> >> None >> >> HTTPServiceUnavailable (HTTP 503) >> >> >> >> If I change back to use native directory, image can upload successfully. >> >> >> >> Anyone know why? >> >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> -chen >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |