Patrick, absolutely yes, it make sense. We will wait with (im)patience Thank you -- Marco Aroldi 2013/3/15 Patrick McGarry <patrick@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > Marco, > > There are definitely folks who would love to see exactly what you are > asking for. However, it's not always as simple as it might seem. > With the ability to set replication levels per pool, and given that no > space is used until you write data to a given pool there are often too > many variables to really understand the "usable" space in the cluster. > > In the future we'll have some ways to gather these variables to let > you create a tool to determine it yourself. Beyond that there are no > solid plans to do what you are asking in the short term. Does that > make sense? > > > Best Regards, > > Patrick McGarry > Director, Community || Inktank > > http://ceph.com || http://inktank.com > @scuttlemonkey || @ceph || @inktank > > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Marco Aroldi <marco.aroldi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Yes Bill, >> but it would be nice to see the real space available reported at least >> by the cephfs clients, retrieving the pool and the relative rep size >> from the monitors and dividing accordingly the total space. >> >> This could be a suggestion for Greg and the other guys working on the >> first stable Cephfs release :) >> >> Thanks >> -- >> Marco Aroldi >> _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |