Re: Rebalancing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 20 Apr 2017, Aaron Bassett wrote:
> That problem has been fixed; I'd try the new jewel version.
> 
>       This is the out of ceph osd test-reweight-by-utilization:
>       no change
>       moved 0 / 278144 (0%)
>       avg 259.948
>       stddev 15.9527 -> 15.9527 (expected baseline 16.1154)
>       min osd.512 with 217 -> 217 pgs (0.834783 -> 0.834783 *
>       mean)
>       max osd.870 with 314 -> 314 pgs (1.20794 -> 1.20794 *
>       mean)
> 
>       oload 120
>       max_change 0.05
>       max_change_osds 4
>       average 0.719013
>       overload 0.862816
> 
> 
> ...and I'm guessing that this isn't doing anything because the
> default 
> oload value of 120 is too high for you.  Try setting that to 110 and 
> re-running test-rewight-by-utilization to see what it will do.
> 
> 
> Google is failing me on oload, are there docs you can point me at?

Sorry, it's just the argument to the command:

osd test-reweight-by-utilization         dry run of reweight OSDs by 
 {<int>} {<float>} {<int>} {--no-         utilization [overload-percentage-for-
 increasing}                              consideration, default 120]

so you want something like

 ceph osd test-reweight-by-utilization 110

(as in 110%.  Yes the arguments and units are super annoying and 
confusing.  This command is eventually going away though... the idea is 
that the mgr will just do this on its own without the admin needing to get 
involved.)

sage
_______________________________________________
Ceph-large mailing list
Ceph-large@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-large-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFS]

  Powered by Linux