Issue 15653 and imbalanced clusters

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

I have a couple questions about http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15653

In the ticket Sage discusses small/big drives, and the small drives get more data than expected.

But we observe this at the rack level: our cluster has four racks, with 7, 8, 8, 4 hosts respectively. The rack with 4 hosts is ~35% more full than the others.

So AFAICT, because of #15653, CRUSH does not currently work well if you try to build a pool which is replicated rack/host-wise when your rack/hosts are not all ~identical in size.

Are others noticing this pattern? 
Or are we unusual in that our clusters are not flat/uniform in structure?

Cheers, Dan
_______________________________________________
Ceph-large mailing list
Ceph-large@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-large-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFS]

  Powered by Linux