Re: Question about code in fs/ceph/addr.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2025-03-18 at 16:25 -0700, Fan Ni wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 10:42:05PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> > Hi Fan,
> > 
> > My aim is to get rid of all page/folio handling from the main part
> > of the
> > filesystem entirely and use netfslib instead.  See:
> > 
> > 	
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20250313233341.1675324-1-dho
> > wells@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#u
> > 
> > Now, this is a work in progress, but I think I have a decent shot
> > at having it
> > ready for the next merge window after the one that should open in
> > about a
> > week.
> > 
> > Note that there, struct ceph_snap_context is built around a
> > netfs_group struct
> > and attachment to folios is handled by netfslib as much as
> > possible.
> > 
> > My patches can be obtained here:
> > 
> > 	
> > https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-
> > fs.git/log/?h=ceph-iter
> > 
> > David
> > 
> Hi David,
> 
> Thanks for your information. 
> That is very useful information to me, since I am still slowly ramp-
> up mm work and lack
> of the whole picture of mm development work. 
> 
> Just to make it more clear to me, so that means all &folio->page and
> like
> will be taken care of with your patches for fs/, right? If so, I will
> skip fs
> and try to work on other sub-system.
> 

As far as I can see, we still have a lot of work in fs/ and CephFS code
for switching from page to folio. :) So, you are really welcome to
contribute.

Thanks,
Slava.






[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux