Re: Does ceph_fill_inode() mishandle I_NEW?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I don't think that can happen. An I_NEW inode hasn't been properly
> hashed yet, so nothing should be able to find it until
> unlock_new_inode() is called.

That's not where the issue lies.  I'm talking about *after* I_NEW has been
cleared.

Imagine you have a file that has hard links in several directories.  Can
simultaneous lookup on a number of those hard links result in you going
through ceph_fill_inode() a number of times in parallel?

David





[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux