On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 12:59 PM Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 11:58:00AM +0000, David Howells wrote: > > Hi Christian, > > > > Unless the ceph people would prefer to take them through the ceph tree, can > > you consider taking the following fixes: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205000249.123054-1-slava@xxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > into the VFS tree and adding: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250217185119.430193-1-willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > on top of that. Willy's patches are for the next merge window, but are > > rebased on top of Viacheslav's patches. > > > > I have the patches here also: > > > > https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git/log/?h=ceph-folio > > Sure! Thanks! I'll wait until tomorrow so people have time to reply. No objection to taking Viacheslav's and Willy's patches through the VFS tree given that there is a dependency and Willy wanted his 10/9 that is strictly speaking outside of Ceph to go along. It would be good if Alex could review Viacheslav's series first though as it's a pretty sizeable refactor. Thanks, Ilya
