Re: [PATCH 1/2] loop: force GFP_NOIO for underlying file systems allocations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] loop: force GFP_NOIO for underlying file systems allocations
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 07:32:51 +0100
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, nbd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Z4pFgIqB50gz-ODi@fedora>
References: <20250117074442.256705-1-hch@lst.de> <20250117074442.256705-2-hch@lst.de> <Z4pFgIqB50gz-ODi@fedora>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 07:56:48PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> If we call memalloc_noio_save() here, setting PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO can be removed
> from loop_process_work().

Nah, we can skip this patch as the explicit PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO does
everything that is needed.

References:
- annotate noio context
  - From: Christoph Hellwig
- [PATCH 1/2] loop: force GFP_NOIO for underlying file systems allocations
  - From: Christoph Hellwig
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] loop: force GFP_NOIO for underlying file systems allocations
  - From: Ming Lei

Prev by Date: Re: Error in generic/397 test script?
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 08/20] afs_d_revalidate(): use stable name and parent inode passed by caller
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] loop: force GFP_NOIO for underlying file systems allocations
Next by thread: [PATCH 2/2] block: force noio scope in blk_mq_freeze_queue
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [CEPH Users] [Ceph Large] [Ceph Dev] [Information on CEPH] [Linux BTRFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux