Re: [PATCH] Use strscpy() instead of strcpy()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le 14/11/2024 à 10:14, Abdul Rahim a écrit :
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 10:28:36PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:

...

diff --git a/fs/ceph/export.c b/fs/ceph/export.c
index 0e5b3c7b3756..48265c879fcf 100644
--- a/fs/ceph/export.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/export.c
@@ -452,7 +452,12 @@ static int __get_snap_name(struct dentry *parent, char *name,
  		goto out;
  	if (ceph_snap(inode) == CEPH_SNAPDIR) {
  		if (ceph_snap(dir) == CEPH_NOSNAP) {
-			strcpy(name, fsc->mount_options->snapdir_name);
+			/*
+			 * get_name assumes that name is pointing to a
+			 * NAME_MAX+1 sized buffer
+			 */

It is a matter of taste, and I'm not the maintainer, but my personal feeling would go for something like:

/* .get_name() from struct export_operations assumes that its 'name' parameter is pointing to a NAME_MAX+1 sized buffer */

CJ

+			strscpy(name, fsc->mount_options->snapdir_name,
+					NAME_MAX+1);
  			err = 0;
  		}
  		goto out;


Looks good?







[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux