Re: [PATCH 0/5] Ceph deadcoding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Ilya Dryomov (idryomov@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 6, 2024 at 3:19 AM <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Hi,
> >   This series is a set of deadcoding in fs/ceph and net/ceph.
> > It's strictly function deletion so should have no change
> > in behaviour.
> >
> > (get_maintainer was suggesting the netdev team as well
> > as ceph? Is that correct???)
> 
> Hi David,
> 
> No, it's not correct.  It's probably caused by
> 
> F:    net/
> 
> entry in "NETWORKING [GENERAL]" section.  I don't recall
> get_maintainer.pl doing that in the past, but I could be wrong.

THanks, I didn't think it was right.

> Anyway, I'll send a patch to exclude net/ceph there.

Thanks, and thanks for applying the cleanup.

Dave

> Thanks,
> 
>                 Ilya
> 
-- 
 -----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code -------   
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert    |       Running GNU/Linux       | Happy  \ 
\        dave @ treblig.org |                               | In Hex /
 \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org   |_______/




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux