On Sun, 2024-08-04 at 23:22 +0000, Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Sun, 2024-08-04 at 16:57 +0300, Hristo Venev wrote: > > In addition to Ceph, in NFS there are also some crashes related to > > the > > use of 0x356 as a pointer. > > > > `netfs_is_cache_enabled()` only returns true when the fscache > > cookie > > is > > fully initialized. This may happen after the request has been > > created, > > so check for the cookie's existence instead. > > > > Link: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/b78c88db-8b3a-4008-94cb-82ae08f0e37b@xxxxxxx/T/ > > Fixes: 2ff1e97587f4 ("netfs: Replace PG_fscache by setting folio- > > > private and marking dirty") > > Cc: linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: blokos <blokos@xxxxxxx> > > Cc: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: dan.aloni@xxxxxxxxxxxx <dan.aloni@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Hristo Venev <hristo@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > fs/netfs/objects.c | 6 +++--- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/netfs/objects.c b/fs/netfs/objects.c > > index f4a6427274792..a74ca90c86c9b 100644 > > --- a/fs/netfs/objects.c > > +++ b/fs/netfs/objects.c > > @@ -27,7 +27,6 @@ struct netfs_io_request > > *netfs_alloc_request(struct > > address_space *mapping, > > bool is_unbuffered = (origin == NETFS_UNBUFFERED_WRITE || > > origin == NETFS_DIO_READ || > > origin == NETFS_DIO_WRITE); > > - bool cached = !is_unbuffered && > > netfs_is_cache_enabled(ctx); > > int ret; > > > > for (;;) { > > @@ -56,8 +55,9 @@ struct netfs_io_request > > *netfs_alloc_request(struct > > address_space *mapping, > > refcount_set(&rreq->ref, 1); > > > > __set_bit(NETFS_RREQ_IN_PROGRESS, &rreq->flags); > > - if (cached) { > > - __set_bit(NETFS_RREQ_WRITE_TO_CACHE, &rreq- > > >flags); > > + if (!is_unbuffered && > > fscache_cookie_valid(netfs_i_cookie(ctx))) { > > + if(netfs_is_cache_enabled(ctx)) > > + __set_bit(NETFS_RREQ_WRITE_TO_CACHE, > > &rreq- > > > flags); > > if (test_bit(NETFS_ICTX_USE_PGPRIV2, &ctx->flags)) > > /* Filesystem uses deprecated PG_private_2 > > marking. */ > > __set_bit(NETFS_RREQ_USE_PGPRIV2, &rreq- > > > flags); > > Does this mean that netfs could still end up setting a value for > folio- > > private in NFS given some other set of circumstances? Hopefully not? For NFS the cookie should be allocated in `nfs_fscache_init_inode`, and for Ceph I think `ceph_fill_inode` (which calls `ceph_fscache_register_inode_cookie`) should also be called early enough as well. > -- > Trond Myklebust > Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace > trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
