On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 03:05:02PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > There is no need to wrap calls to the no_printk() helper inside an > always-false check, as no_printk() already does that internally. This also makes sense. Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
