Re: [PATCH 0/2] ceph: allocate a smaller extent map if possible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 8:26 AM <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> For fscrypt case mostly we can predict the max count of the extent
> map, so try to allocate a smaller size instead.
>
>
> Xiubo Li (2):
>   libceph: specify the sparse read extent count
>   ceph: try to allocate a smaller extent map for sparse read
>
>  fs/ceph/addr.c                  |  4 +++-
>  fs/ceph/file.c                  |  8 ++++++--
>  fs/ceph/super.h                 | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/ceph/osd_client.h |  6 ++++--
>  4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.41.0
>

Tested-by: Venky Shankar <vshankar@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Cheers,
Venky






[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux