Re: [PATCH 00/20] filelock: split struct file_lock into file_lock and file_lease structs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 18 Jan 2024, Chuck Lever wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 02:45:56PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > Long ago, file locks used to hang off of a singly-linked list in struct
> > inode. Because of this, when leases were added, they were added to the
> > same list and so they had to be tracked using the same sort of
> > structure.
> > 
> > Several years ago, we added struct file_lock_context, which allowed us
> > to use separate lists to track different types of file locks. Given
> > that, leases no longer need to be tracked using struct file_lock.
> > 
> > That said, a lot of the underlying infrastructure _is_ the same between
> > file leases and locks, so we can't completely separate everything.
> 
> Naive question: locks and leases are similar. Why do they need to be
> split apart? The cover letter doesn't address that, and I'm new
> enough at this that I don't have that context.

For me, the big win was in the last patch where we got separate
lock_manager_operations and lease_manager_operations.  There is zero
overlap between the two.  This highlights that one one level these are
different things with different behaviours.

NeilBrown




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux