On Tue, 2023-10-24 at 13:00 +0800, xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx> > > No need to decrease the data length again if we need to read the > left data. > > URL: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/62081 > Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > net/ceph/messenger_v2.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/net/ceph/messenger_v2.c b/net/ceph/messenger_v2.c > index d09a39ff2cf0..9e3f95d5e425 100644 > --- a/net/ceph/messenger_v2.c > +++ b/net/ceph/messenger_v2.c > @@ -1966,7 +1966,6 @@ static int prepare_sparse_read_cont(struct ceph_connection *con) > bv.bv_offset = 0; > } > set_in_bvec(con, &bv); > - con->v2.data_len_remain -= bv.bv_len; > return 0; > } > } else if (iov_iter_is_kvec(&con->v2.in_iter)) { It's been a while since I was in this code, but where does this get decremented if you're removing it here? Thanks, -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
