On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 07:55:01AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > On Mon, 2023-08-28 at 09:19 +0800, Xiubo Li wrote: > > Next time please rebase to the latest ceph-client latest upstream > > 'testing' branch, we need to test this series by using the qa > > teuthology, which is running based on the 'testing' branch. > > People working on wide-scale changes to the kernel really shouldn't have > to go hunting down random branches to base their changes on. That's the > purpose of linux-next. Yes. As I said last time this came up https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/ZH94oBBFct9b9g3z@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ it's not reasonable for me to track down every filesystem's private git tree. I'm happy to re-do these patches against linux-next in a week or two, but I'm not going to start working against your ceph tree. I'm not a Ceph developer, I'm a Linux developer. I work against Linus' tree or Stephen's tree.
