On 07/12/2022 22:28, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 1:35 PM Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 07/12/2022 18:59, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 1:59 PM <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx>
When received corrupted snap trace we don't know what exactly has
happened in MDS side. And we shouldn't continue writing to OSD,
which may corrupt the snapshot contents.
Just try to blocklist this client and If fails we need to crash the
client instead of leaving it writeable to OSDs.
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
URL: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/57686
Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Thanks Aaron's feedback.
V3:
- Fixed ERROR: spaces required around that ':' (ctx:VxW)
V2:
- Switched to WARN() to taint the Linux kernel.
fs/ceph/mds_client.c | 3 ++-
fs/ceph/mds_client.h | 1 +
fs/ceph/snap.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ceph/mds_client.c b/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
index cbbaf334b6b8..59094944af28 100644
--- a/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
@@ -5648,7 +5648,8 @@ static void mds_peer_reset(struct ceph_connection *con)
struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc = s->s_mdsc;
pr_warn("mds%d closed our session\n", s->s_mds);
- send_mds_reconnect(mdsc, s);
+ if (!mdsc->no_reconnect)
+ send_mds_reconnect(mdsc, s);
}
static void mds_dispatch(struct ceph_connection *con, struct ceph_msg *msg)
diff --git a/fs/ceph/mds_client.h b/fs/ceph/mds_client.h
index 728b7d72bf76..8e8f0447c0ad 100644
--- a/fs/ceph/mds_client.h
+++ b/fs/ceph/mds_client.h
@@ -413,6 +413,7 @@ struct ceph_mds_client {
atomic_t num_sessions;
int max_sessions; /* len of sessions array */
int stopping; /* true if shutting down */
+ int no_reconnect; /* true if snap trace is corrupted */
atomic64_t quotarealms_count; /* # realms with quota */
/*
diff --git a/fs/ceph/snap.c b/fs/ceph/snap.c
index c1c452afa84d..023852b7c527 100644
--- a/fs/ceph/snap.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/snap.c
@@ -767,8 +767,10 @@ int ceph_update_snap_trace(struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc,
struct ceph_snap_realm *realm;
struct ceph_snap_realm *first_realm = NULL;
struct ceph_snap_realm *realm_to_rebuild = NULL;
+ struct ceph_client *client = mdsc->fsc->client;
int rebuild_snapcs;
int err = -ENOMEM;
+ int ret;
LIST_HEAD(dirty_realms);
lockdep_assert_held_write(&mdsc->snap_rwsem);
@@ -885,6 +887,29 @@ int ceph_update_snap_trace(struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc,
if (first_realm)
ceph_put_snap_realm(mdsc, first_realm);
pr_err("%s error %d\n", __func__, err);
+
+ /*
+ * When receiving a corrupted snap trace we don't know what
+ * exactly has happened in MDS side. And we shouldn't continue
+ * writing to OSD, which may corrupt the snapshot contents.
+ *
+ * Just try to blocklist this kclient and if it fails we need
+ * to crash the kclient instead of leaving it writeable.
Hi Xiubo,
I'm not sure I understand this "let's blocklist ourselves" concept.
If the kernel client shouldn't continue writing to OSDs in this case,
why not just stop issuing writes -- perhaps initiating some equivalent
of a read-only remount like many local filesystems would do on I/O
errors (e.g. errors=remount-ro mode)?
I still haven't found how could I handle it this way from ceph layer. I
saw they are just marking the inodes as EIO when this happens.
Or, perhaps, all in-memory snap contexts could somehow be invalidated
in this case, making writes fail naturally -- on the client side,
without actually being sent to OSDs just to be nixed by the blocklist
hammer.
But further, what makes a failure to decode a snap trace special?
From the known tracker the snapid was corrupted in one inode in MDS and
then when trying to build the snap trace with the corrupted snapid it
will corrupt.
And also there maybe other cases.
AFAIK we don't do anything close to this for any other decoding
failure. Wouldn't "when received corrupted XYZ we don't know what
exactly has happened in MDS side" argument apply to pretty much all
decoding failures?
The snap trace is different from other cases. The corrupted snap trace
will affect the whole snap realm hierarchy, which will affect the whole
inodes in the mount in worst case.
This is why I was trying to evict the mount to prevent further IOs.
I suspected as much and my other suggestion was to look at somehow
invalidating snap contexts/realms. Perhaps decode out-of-place and on
any error set a flag indicating that the snap context can't be trusted
anymore? The OSD client could then check whether this flag is set
before admitting the snap context blob into the request message and
return an error, effectively rejecting the write.
The snap realms are organize as tree-like hierarchy. When the snap trace
is corruppted maybe only one of the snap realms are affected and maybe
several or all. The problem is when decoding the corrupted snap trace we
couldn't know exactly which realms will be affected. If one realm is
marked as invalid all the child realms should be affected too.
So I don't think this is a better approach than read-only or evicting ones.
Thanks,
- Xiubo
Thanks,
Ilya
