On 29/11/2022 22:32, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 3:15 PM Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 29/11/2022 18:39, Luís Henriques wrote:
When setting a directory's crypt context, ceph_dir_clear_complete() needs to
be called otherwise if it was complete before, any existing (old) dentry will
still be valid.
This patch adds a wrapper around __fscrypt_prepare_readdir() which will
ensure a directory is marked as non-complete if key status changes.
Signed-off-by: Luís Henriques <lhenriques@xxxxxxx>
---
Hi Xiubo,
Here's a rebase of this patch. I did some testing but since this branch
doesn't really have full fscrypt support, I couldn't even reproduce the
bug. So, my testing was limited.
I'm planing not to update the wip-fscrypt branch any more, except the IO
path related fixes, which may introduce potential bugs each time as before.
Since the qa tests PR has finished and the tests have passed, so we are
planing to merge the first none IO part, around 27 patches. And then
pull the reset patches from wip-fscrypt branch.
I'm not sure if merging metadata and I/O path patches separately
makes sense. What would a user do with just filename encryption?
Hi Ilya,
I think the IO ones should be followed soon.
Currently the filename ones have been well testes. And the contents will
be by passed for now.
Since this is just for Dev Preview feature IMO it should be okay (?)
Once fscrypt test suite is merged, I think we should let it bake
for for a few weeks and then merge the whole thing together.
Talked with Jeff before we both agreed to split the patches to make it
to be easier to handle.
But this also should be okay for me.
Venky, Greg
What do you think ?
Thanks.
- Xiubo
Thanks,
Ilya
