> On Nov 16, 2022, at 10:17 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> nfsd currently doesn't access i_flctx safely everywhere. This requires a
> smp_load_acquire, as the pointer is set via cmpxchg (a release
> operation).
>
> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index 836bd825ca4a..da8d0ea66229 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -4758,7 +4758,7 @@ nfs4_share_conflict(struct svc_fh *current_fh, unsigned int deny_type)
>
> static bool nfsd4_deleg_present(const struct inode *inode)
> {
> - struct file_lock_context *ctx = smp_load_acquire(&inode->i_flctx);
> + struct file_lock_context *ctx = locks_inode_context(inode);
>
> return ctx && !list_empty_careful(&ctx->flc_lease);
> }
> @@ -5897,7 +5897,7 @@ nfs4_lockowner_has_blockers(struct nfs4_lockowner *lo)
>
> list_for_each_entry(stp, &lo->lo_owner.so_stateids, st_perstateowner) {
> nf = stp->st_stid.sc_file;
> - ctx = nf->fi_inode->i_flctx;
> + ctx = locks_inode_context(nf->fi_inode);
> if (!ctx)
> continue;
> if (locks_owner_has_blockers(ctx, lo))
> @@ -7713,7 +7713,7 @@ check_for_locks(struct nfs4_file *fp, struct nfs4_lockowner *lowner)
> }
>
> inode = locks_inode(nf->nf_file);
> - flctx = inode->i_flctx;
> + flctx = locks_inode_context(inode);
>
> if (flctx && !list_empty_careful(&flctx->flc_posix)) {
> spin_lock(&flctx->flc_lock);
> --
> 2.38.1
>
--
Chuck Lever
