Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] ceph: use a xarray to record all the opened files for each inode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi

Thanks for reporting this.

I will fix it in the next version.

- Xiubo

On 14/11/2022 16:54, kernel test robot wrote:
Hi,

I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:

[auto build test WARNING on ceph-client/testing]
[also build test WARNING on ceph-client/for-linus linus/master v6.1-rc5 next-20221111]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/xiubli-redhat-com/ceph-fix-the-use-after-free-bug-for-file_lock/20221114-132233
base:   https://github.com/ceph/ceph-client.git testing
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221114051901.15371-3-xiubli%40redhat.com
patch subject: [PATCH 2/2 v2] ceph: use a xarray to record all the opened files for each inode
config: hexagon-randconfig-r041-20221114
compiler: clang version 16.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 463da45892e2d2a262277b91b96f5f8c05dc25d0)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
         # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/232cc8f1dbeddb308946202a7c67ee4d20451ae7
         git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
         git fetch --no-tags linux-review xiubli-redhat-com/ceph-fix-the-use-after-free-bug-for-file_lock/20221114-132233
         git checkout 232cc8f1dbeddb308946202a7c67ee4d20451ae7
         # save the config file
         mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
         COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=hexagon SHELL=/bin/bash fs/ceph/

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

    In file included from fs/ceph/locks.c:8:
    In file included from fs/ceph/super.h:8:
    In file included from include/linux/backing-dev.h:16:
    In file included from include/linux/writeback.h:13:
    In file included from include/linux/blk_types.h:10:
    In file included from include/linux/bvec.h:10:
    In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:12:
    In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
    In file included from ./arch/hexagon/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
    In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
    In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
    In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
    In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:334:
    include/asm-generic/io.h:547:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
            val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                              ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
    include/asm-generic/io.h:560:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
            val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
                                                            ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
    include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:37:51: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
    #define __le16_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
                                                      ^
    In file included from fs/ceph/locks.c:8:
    In file included from fs/ceph/super.h:8:
    In file included from include/linux/backing-dev.h:16:
    In file included from include/linux/writeback.h:13:
    In file included from include/linux/blk_types.h:10:
    In file included from include/linux/bvec.h:10:
    In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:12:
    In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
    In file included from ./arch/hexagon/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
    In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
    In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
    In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
    In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:334:
    include/asm-generic/io.h:573:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
            val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
                                                            ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
    include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:35:51: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
    #define __le32_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
                                                      ^
    In file included from fs/ceph/locks.c:8:
    In file included from fs/ceph/super.h:8:
    In file included from include/linux/backing-dev.h:16:
    In file included from include/linux/writeback.h:13:
    In file included from include/linux/blk_types.h:10:
    In file included from include/linux/bvec.h:10:
    In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:12:
    In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
    In file included from ./arch/hexagon/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
    In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
    In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
    In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
    In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:334:
    include/asm-generic/io.h:584:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
            __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                                ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
    include/asm-generic/io.h:594:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
            __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                                                          ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
    include/asm-generic/io.h:604:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
            __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                                                          ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
fs/ceph/locks.c:66:6: warning: variable 'fi' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
            if (val == CEPH_FILP_AVAILABLE) {
                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    fs/ceph/locks.c:79:14: note: uninitialized use occurs here
            atomic_dec(&fi->num_locks);
                        ^~
    fs/ceph/locks.c:66:2: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is always true
            if (val == CEPH_FILP_AVAILABLE) {
            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    fs/ceph/locks.c:47:27: note: initialize the variable 'fi' to silence this warning
            struct ceph_file_info *fi;
                                     ^
                                      = NULL
    7 warnings generated.


vim +66 fs/ceph/locks.c

     42	
     43	static void ceph_fl_release_lock(struct file_lock *fl)
     44	{
     45		struct inode *inode = fl->fl_u.ceph_fl.fl_inode;
     46		struct ceph_inode_info *ci;
     47		struct ceph_file_info *fi;
     48		void *val;
     49	
     50		/*
     51		 * If inode is NULL it should be a request file_lock,
     52		 * nothing we can do.
     53		 */
     54		if (!inode)
     55			return;
     56	
     57		ci = ceph_inode(inode);
     58	
     59		/*
     60		 * For Posix-style locks, it may race between filp_close()s,
     61		 * and it's possible that the 'file' memory pointed by
     62		 * 'fl->fl_file' has been released. If so just skip it.
     63		 */
     64		rcu_read_lock();
     65		val = xa_load(&ci->i_opened_files, (unsigned long)fl->fl_file);
   > 66		if (val == CEPH_FILP_AVAILABLE) {
     67			fi = fl->fl_file->private_data;
     68			atomic_dec(&fi->num_locks);
     69		}
     70		rcu_read_unlock();
     71	
     72		if (atomic_dec_and_test(&ci->i_filelock_ref)) {
     73			/* clear error when all locks are released */
     74			spin_lock(&ci->i_ceph_lock);
     75			ci->i_ceph_flags &= ~CEPH_I_ERROR_FILELOCK;
     76			spin_unlock(&ci->i_ceph_lock);
     77		}
     78		iput(inode);
     79		atomic_dec(&fi->num_locks);
     80	}
     81	





[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux