On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 11:00:21AM +0800, xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> common/encrypt | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/common/encrypt b/common/encrypt
> index 45ce0954..1a77e23b 100644
> --- a/common/encrypt
> +++ b/common/encrypt
> @@ -153,6 +153,9 @@ _scratch_mkfs_encrypted()
> # erase the UBI volume; reformated automatically on next mount
> $UBIUPDATEVOL_PROG ${SCRATCH_DEV} -t
> ;;
> + ceph)
> + _scratch_cleanup_files
> + ;;
Any commits about that?
Sorry I'm not familar with cephfs, is this patch enough to help ceph to test
encrypted ceph? Due to you tried to do some "checking" job last time.
Can "./check -g encrypt" work on ceph? May you paste this test result to help
to review? And welcome review points from ceph list.
Thanks,
Zorro
[1]
$ grep -rsn _scratch_mkfs_encrypted tests/generic/
tests/generic/395:22:_scratch_mkfs_encrypted &>> $seqres.full
tests/generic/396:21:_scratch_mkfs_encrypted &>> $seqres.full
tests/generic/580:23:_scratch_mkfs_encrypted &>> $seqres.full
tests/generic/581:36:_scratch_mkfs_encrypted &>> $seqres.full
tests/generic/595:35:_scratch_mkfs_encrypted &>> $seqres.full
tests/generic/613:29:_scratch_mkfs_encrypted &>> $seqres.full
tests/generic/621:57:_scratch_mkfs_encrypted &>> $seqres.full
tests/generic/429:36:_scratch_mkfs_encrypted &>> $seqres.full
tests/generic/397:28:_scratch_mkfs_encrypted &>> $seqres.full
tests/generic/398:28:_scratch_mkfs_encrypted &>> $seqres.full
tests/generic/421:24:_scratch_mkfs_encrypted &>> $seqres.full
tests/generic/440:29:_scratch_mkfs_encrypted &>> $seqres.full
tests/generic/419:29:_scratch_mkfs_encrypted &>> $seqres.full
tests/generic/435:33:_scratch_mkfs_encrypted &>> $seqres.full
tests/generic/593:24:_scratch_mkfs_encrypted &>> $seqres.full
tests/generic/576:34:_scratch_mkfs_encrypted_verity &>> $seqres.full
> *)
> _notrun "No encryption support for $FSTYP"
> ;;
> --
> 2.31.1
>
