On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 10:22:37PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 05:08:11PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > > > Actually, I never got a formal ack from Al. I did send it repeatedly, > > but I assume he has been too busy to respond. We've had it sitting in > > linux-next for a couple of months, and he did suggest that approach in > > the first place, but I too would also prefer to see his official ack on > > it. > > "Suggested approach" had been about inode_insert5() changes, right? > But that's fs/inode.c side of things... I have to admit that I'd missed > the unlining d_same_name() - exporting the sucker per se didn't look s/un/&in/ and I really need to grab some coffee...
