On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 9:12 AM Li Qiong <liqiong@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> It should be better to check pointer firstly, then assign it
> to c->rules[]. Refine code a little bit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Qiong <liqiong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> net/ceph/osdmap.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ceph/osdmap.c b/net/ceph/osdmap.c
> index 2823bb3cff55..6ec5007f96dc 100644
> --- a/net/ceph/osdmap.c
> +++ b/net/ceph/osdmap.c
> @@ -571,9 +571,9 @@ static struct crush_map *crush_decode(void *pbyval, void *end)
> goto bad;
> #endif
> r = kmalloc(struct_size(r, steps, yes), GFP_NOFS);
> - c->rules[i] = r;
> if (r == NULL)
> goto badmem;
> + c->rules[i] = r;
> dout(" rule %d is at %p\n", i, r);
> r->len = yes;
> ceph_decode_copy_safe(p, end, &r->mask, 4, bad); /* 4 u8's */
> --
> 2.11.0
>
This doesn't change anything as c->rules pointer array is zeroed out.
Anyway, applied.
Thanks,
Ilya
