Re: [PATCH] ceph: wait on async create before checking caps for syncfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2022-06-07 at 09:50 +0800, Xiubo Li wrote:
> On 6/7/22 9:21 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > On Tue, 2022-06-07 at 09:11 +0800, Xiubo Li wrote:
> > > On 6/7/22 7:31 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > > Currently, we'll call ceph_check_caps, but if we're still waiting on the
> > > > reply, we'll end up spinning around on the same inode in
> > > > flush_dirty_session_caps. Wait for the async create reply before
> > > > flushing caps.
> > > > 
> > > > Fixes: fbed7045f552 (ceph: wait for async create reply before sending any cap messages)
> > > > URL: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/55823
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >    fs/ceph/caps.c | 1 +
> > > >    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > > 
> > > > I don't know if this will fix the tx queue stalls completely, but I
> > > > haven't seen one with this patch in place. I think it makes sense on its
> > > > own, either way.
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/fs/ceph/caps.c b/fs/ceph/caps.c
> > > > index 0a48bf829671..5ecfff4b37c9 100644
> > > > --- a/fs/ceph/caps.c
> > > > +++ b/fs/ceph/caps.c
> > > > @@ -4389,6 +4389,7 @@ static void flush_dirty_session_caps(struct ceph_mds_session *s)
> > > >    		ihold(inode);
> > > >    		dout("flush_dirty_caps %llx.%llx\n", ceph_vinop(inode));
> > > >    		spin_unlock(&mdsc->cap_dirty_lock);
> > > > +		ceph_wait_on_async_create(inode);
> > > >    		ceph_check_caps(ci, CHECK_CAPS_FLUSH, NULL);
> > > >    		iput(inode);
> > > >    		spin_lock(&mdsc->cap_dirty_lock);
> > > This looks good.
> > > 
> > > Possibly we can add one dedicated list to store the async creating
> > > inodes instead of getting stuck all the others ?
> > > 
> > I'd be open to that. I think we ought to take this patch first to fix
> > the immediate bug though, before we add extra complexity.
> 
> Sounds good to me.
> 
> I will merge it to the testing branch for now and let's improve it later.
> 

Can we also mark this for stable? It's a pretty nasty bug, potentially.
We should get this into mainline fairly soon.

Thanks,
-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux