Re: [PATCH] ceph: check folio PG_private bit instead of folio->private

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 5/9/22 5:13 PM, Luís Henriques wrote:
On Sun, May 08, 2022 at 02:15:43PM +0800, Xiubo Li wrote:
The pages in the file mapping maybe reclaimed and reused by other
subsystems and the page->private maybe used as flags field or
something else, if later that pages are used by page caches again
the page->private maybe not cleared as expected.

Here will check the PG_private bit instead of the folio->private.
I thought that a patch to set ->private to NULL in the folio code (maybe
in folio_end_private_2()) would make sense.  But then... it probably
wouldn't get accepted as we're probably not supposed to assume these
fields are initialised.

Not very sure this or something like this is correct place to clear the ->private.

Because the 'folio' and 'page' struct are like union and also in the 'page' struct there also has a big union, such as any of the following field could affect the ->private:


unsigned long private;
unsigned long dma_addr_upper;
atomic_long_t pp_frag_count;
atomic_t compound_pincount;
spinlock_t ptl;


Anyway, thanks Xiubo!

Reviewed-by: Luís Henriques <lhenriques@xxxxxxx>

Thanks Luis.

-- Xiubo


Cheers,
--
Luís

Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
URL: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/55421
Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  fs/ceph/addr.c | 6 +++---
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ceph/addr.c b/fs/ceph/addr.c
index 63b7430e1ce6..1a108f24e7d9 100644
--- a/fs/ceph/addr.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/addr.c
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static bool ceph_dirty_folio(struct address_space *mapping, struct folio *folio)
  	if (folio_test_dirty(folio)) {
  		dout("%p dirty_folio %p idx %lu -- already dirty\n",
  		     mapping->host, folio, folio->index);
-		VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_get_private(folio), folio);
+		VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_private(folio), folio);
  		return false;
  	}
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ static bool ceph_dirty_folio(struct address_space *mapping, struct folio *folio)
  	 * Reference snap context in folio->private.  Also set
  	 * PagePrivate so that we get invalidate_folio callback.
  	 */
-	VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_get_private(folio), folio);
+	VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_private(folio), folio);
  	folio_attach_private(folio, snapc);
return ceph_fscache_dirty_folio(mapping, folio);
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static void ceph_invalidate_folio(struct folio *folio, size_t offset,
  	}
WARN_ON(!folio_test_locked(folio));
-	if (folio_get_private(folio)) {
+	if (folio_test_private(folio)) {
  		dout("%p invalidate_folio idx %lu full dirty page\n",
  		     inode, folio->index);
--
2.36.0.rc1





[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux