Re: [PATCH] ceph: don't retain the caps if they're being revoked and not used

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2022-04-28 at 20:13 +0800, Xiubo Li wrote:
> For example if the Frwcb caps are being revoked, but only the Fr
> caps is still being used then the kclient will skip releasing them
> all. But in next turn if the Fr caps is ready to be released the
> Fw caps maybe just being used again. So in corner case, such as
> heavy load IOs, the revocation maybe stuck for a long time.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/ceph/caps.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/caps.c b/fs/ceph/caps.c
> index 0c0c8f5ae3b3..7eb5238941fc 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/caps.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/caps.c
> @@ -1947,6 +1947,13 @@ void ceph_check_caps(struct ceph_inode_info *ci, int flags,
>  
>  	/* The ones we currently want to retain (may be adjusted below) */
>  	retain = file_wanted | used | CEPH_CAP_PIN;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Do not retain the capabilities if they are under revoking
> +	 * but not used, this could help speed up the revoking.
> +	 */
> +	retain &= ~((revoking & retain) & ~used);
> +
>  	if (!mdsc->stopping && inode->i_nlink > 0) {
>  		if (file_wanted) {
>  			retain |= CEPH_CAP_ANY;       /* be greedy */

Oh wow, I thought this was being done already! Curse the complex logic
in this function.

Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux